GET THE APP

Associating Health Care with Socialization

Health Economics & Outcome Research: Open Access

ISSN - 2471-268X

Commentary Article - (2022) Volume 8, Issue 7

Associating Health Care with Socialization

Aluvia Fitton*
 
*Correspondence: Aluvia Fitton, Editorial office,Health Economics and Outcome Research , Brussels, Belgium, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Skills in health literacy are becoming more and more crucial for both health and healthcare. Unfortunately, many patients with the most severe and intricate medical issues are most susceptible to misunderstanding their diagnoses, drugs, and treatment recommendations. The majority of printed materials for patient education and health promotion have historically been written for reading skills at or above the 10th grade. Millions of Americans with low literacy levels cannot access this material. The prevalence of low health literacy levels in America is briefly discussed in this research, along with how it affects people's experiences receiving medical care.

Even though refugees probably have distinct and different health care demands compared to immigrants from lower socioeconomic or family classes, a large portion of the study material currently available on the health of immigrant groups ignores their experiences with healthcare. This research aims to investigate the structural hurdles to health care that the refugee communities in Canada face. The goal of the essay is to comprehend these difficulties as they are described by Hamilton, Ontario's local health and social service professionals. Data from interviews show how these systemic constraints affect both providers and migrants. In terms of health care and service accessibility, the article looks at challenges with interpretation/language, cultural competency, health insurance coverage, poverty, and transportation.

Introduction

The major thread of women's destiny is woven around caring, which is why caring is at the very core of women's history. It has dominated their activities and, as a result, shaped the expectations placed on them. Even those women who do not want to be burdened by it today have their futures shaped by it. It is important to consider the reasons why the network of care that women have historically disseminated has been undervalued, taken for granted, and in some cases even hated, denounced as cunning and perverse, or suppressed as unwanted.In order to comprehend what contributed to the underestimating and devaluation of the care supplied by women, it appears vital to understand and clarify what the cultural foundations of cure and cure practices are in Korea, social insurance for health care began in 1977, and in 1989, the entire population was covered. In the case of industrial workers, insurance contributions (premia) are proportional to income and split equally between the company and the employee. The government subsidizes the insurance contribution for selfemployed people. Before health insurance societies merged in 2000, there were more than 350 quasi-public health insurance organizations that made up the national health insurance system.

In addition to pre-immigration circumstances, the relatively poor health of refugees and the observed decreases in their health after arrival may be attributed to structural hurdles to accessing health treatment, despite correspondingly high health requirements. As an illustration, identified difficulties for the refugee community included not only access to care but also the fact that many refugees were unfamiliar with the health care system, dissatisfied with the dearth of culturally competent care, and unable to navigate the system to satisfy their requirements. The need for professionals to reflect on their own and other people's cultural attitudes, beliefs, behavior, and communication methods as well as to change practice skills that enable high-quality, non-discriminatory care has been raised by calls for more culturally competent treatment.

Conclusion

Consumer cost-sharing has played a significant role in Korea's health care policy for a long time in order to keep expenses under control. Instead of altering the financial incentives for healthcare providers, the government has always increased patient co-payments in response to the national health insurance program's financial difficulties. As a result, patients are responsible for paying out-of-pocket for more than half of the overall cost of healthcare. Demand-side cost sharing should no longer be a policy priority for Korea's national health insurance; instead, the payment structure for healthcare providers has to be reformed. A strategic plan will be essential for the future reform of the payment system given the powerful provider interests.

Author Info

Aluvia Fitton*
 
Editorial office,Health Economics and Outcome Research , Brussels, Belgium
 

Citation: Fitton, A. Associating Health Care with Socialization. Health Econ Outcome Res: Open Access. 2022, 08 (07), 07.

Received: 06-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. HEOR-22-75209; Editor assigned: 07-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. HEOR-22-75209 (PQ); Reviewed: 22-Jul-2022, QC No. HEOR-22-75209 (Q); Revised: 27-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. HEOR-22-75209 (R); Published: 30-Jul-2022, DOI: 10.37532/heor.22.8.7.7.

Copyright: © 2022 Fitton, A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.