Mental symbolism is an under-investigated field in clinical brain science research yet presents a subject of likely revenue and importance across numerous clinical issues, including social fear, schizophrenia, sadness, and post-horrendous pressure problem. There is as of now an absence of a directing system from which clinicians might choose the areas or related gauges probably going to be of proper use in mental symbolism research. We embrace an interdisciplinary methodology and present a survey of concentrates across trial brain science and clinical brain research to feature the critical areas and measures probably going to be of importance. This incorporates a thought of strategies for tentatively surveying the age, upkeep, examination and change of mental pictures; as well as abstract proportions of qualities like picture distinctiveness and clearness. We present a directing structure in which we recommend that mental, abstract and clinical parts of symbolism ought to be investigated in future examination. The directing system expects to help scientists in the choice of measures for evaluating those parts of mental symbolism that are of most pertinence to clinical brain science. We recommend that a more prominent comprehension of the job of mental symbolism in clinical issues will help drive forward propels in both hypothesis and treatment.